To argue for complementarity or integrativeness implies that the knowledge bases of the paradigms are commensurable — that’shttps://thegodschildproject.net they don’t seem to be logically inconsistent. For examplehttps://thegodschildproject.net in the paradigm that we now name typical scientific medicinehttps://thegodschildproject.net dilution of a therapeutic substance weakens its efficiency. Howeverhttps://thegodschildproject.net within the homoeopathic paradigmhttps://thegodschildproject.net dilution — even a number of times in order that few molecules of the original substance remain — actually will increase its efficiency.
For efficacy studies to determine whether or not acupuncture has specific effectshttps://thegodschildproject.net “sham” types of acupuncture the place the patienthttps://thegodschildproject.net practitionerhttps://thegodschildproject.net and analyst are blinded seem the most acceptable approach. Sham acupuncture uses non-penetrating needles or needling at non-acupuncture factorshttps://thegodschildproject.net e.g. inserting needles on meridians not related to the specific condition being studiedhttps://thegodschildproject.net or in places not associated with meridians. The under-performance of acupuncture in such trials may point out that therapeutic results are due totally to non-particular effectshttps://thegodschildproject.net or that the sham treatments usually are not inerthttps://thegodschildproject.net or that systematic protocols yield less than optimal remedy. The results dohttps://thegodschildproject.net nonethelesshttps://thegodschildproject.net provide robust help for the philosophical/value congruence theory in several methods. Firsthttps://thegodschildproject.net as hypothesizedhttps://thegodschildproject.net having a holistic philosophy of well being (“The well being of my …